UAPRAD UAPの研究と情報公開
ホームブリーフィングコミュニティ人物事例ハンガー公開記録目撃者
会員エリア
認証済みクリエイター Host: Vinnie Adams

Disclosure Team

このチャンネルは、UAPの情報公開と関連する主題について、研究者、内部告発者、調査報道ジャーナリストへの長時間インタビューに重点を置いています。

概要

Vinnie Adamsが司会を務めるDisclosure Teamは、研究者、調査者、ジャーナリスト、退役軍人、著者、内部事情を知るとする人々を招き、UFOおよびUAPをめぐる動向を整理します。チャンネルはドキュメンタリー形式よりも長時間インタビューと慎重な対話を重視し、情報公開の報道、内部告発者の証言、政府の透明性、歴史的なUFO事例、秘密プログラム、非人間知性をめぐる議論を扱います。

Youtube Channel

最新エピソード

'The Cote Photo' Documentary - Filmmaker Adam Pillon & Researcher Esteban Carranza

'The Cote Photo' Documentary - Filmmaker Adam Pillon & Researcher Esteban Carranza

In 1971, an automated mapping camera photographed an unusual form above Lake Cote, Costa Rica. Vinnie Adams asks researcher Esteban Carranza how the negative passed into his care, how subsequent scans were produced and why he rejects explanations such as dust, reflection or lens flare. Filmmaker Adam Pillon discusses the documentary built around the photograph and the people connected to it. Neither guest claims to know what the image shows.

Key themes

A photograph made by accident

Nobody aboard the aircraft was trying to photograph a UFO. Carranza says the mapping camera fired automatically every 13 seconds and that the crew noticed nothing unusual during the flight. The unusual form appears in frame 300 but not in the neighbouring exposures, making the sequence—not simply the familiar cropped image—central to the case.

The negative and its digital history

Carranza traces the negative from the Costa Rican mapping archive through his uncle Hermann Kopper and into his own care. He describes an initial scan in Costa Rica, a drum scan by Michael Strickland in the United States and a later scan that retained scratches and other marks normally removed during photographic processing. The raw-format scan is available to download, and Carranza says he would make the negative available if better imaging became possible.

Photographic explanations and an unidentified image

Adams asks about dust, reflection, lens flare and camera malfunction. Carranza answers from the camera’s operation and Strickland’s reported examination of the film grain, while Pillon points to the form’s apparent shape and lighting. Their answers explain why they reject several conventional artefacts, but they do not determine what produced the image.

The people around the photograph

Pillon did not set out to make a purely technical film about an old photograph. Sergio Loaiza, Kelly, Emi and the other participants became central as production continued, bringing family history, stigma and personal experience into the story. The result is a documentary about the lives gathered around the image as much as the image itself.

Assessment

Why the photograph remains of interest

The Lake Cote case combines an automated government mapping survey, a surviving negative with a reported custody history, neighbouring exposures and high-resolution scans that can be examined beyond the familiar crop. Carranza connects those parts of the history and explains why later scans were made differently. His account gives researchers a route through the photograph’s provenance and the material available for further study.

What further analysis requires

The original negative, the camera and flight records, and a complete account of each scan would give specialists a firmer basis for comparing photographic explanations. Making the highest-quality files available is therefore more important than repeatedly interpreting the cropped image. The form in frame 300 remains unidentified; this conversation cannot establish its nature or origin.

More content

UAPRADUAP Research and Disclosure OUR MISSION UAPRAD logo
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseLegal & Policies
UAPRAD App

Download our companion Android app from the Google Play Store.

Socials

UAPRAD on X profile image@UAPRADVisit X
Sponsor with Stripe
© 2026 UAPRAD. All rights reserved.