UAPRADUAP Research and Disclosure
Member Area

Exeter Incident

Overview

The Exeter Incident occurred during the early hours of 3 September 1965 near the town of Exeter, New Hampshire, and is widely regarded as one of the most credible UAP cases investigated during the Project Blue Book era. The case involved multiple independent witnesses, police officers and military investigators, and became one of the most extensively documented sightings of the 1960s.

The incident began when Norman Muscarello, an 18-year-old motorist, arrived at the Exeter Police Station shortly after 2:00 a.m. Muscarello reported that while walking along a rural road after his vehicle had run out of fuel, he encountered a large, brightly illuminated object hovering above a nearby field.

Initially sceptical, Officer Eugene Bertrand accompanied Muscarello back to the location to investigate. Shortly after arriving, both men reported observing the same object. Later, Officer David Hunt independently witnessed a similar object while responding to the incident from another location.

Reported Characteristics

Although individual accounts differed slightly, several consistent features were reported:

  • A large, dark object hovering at low altitude.
  • Five bright red lights arranged in a regular pattern.
  • Silent or nearly silent operation while hovering.
  • Rapid acceleration when departing.
  • The object manoeuvring at low altitude over nearby fields.
  • No visible wings, tail, propellers or conventional means of propulsion.

Muscarello estimated that the object approached to within a relatively short distance before moving away at high speed. Both police officers provided descriptions broadly consistent with his account.

Investigation

The Exeter Incident was investigated by the United States Air Force through Project Blue Book.

Investigators interviewed the principal witnesses and examined possible conventional explanations. The Air Force ultimately concluded that the sightings were most likely attributable to the planet Venus, combined with observations of nearby military aircraft conducting aerial refuelling operations.

Many researchers, including Dr. J. Allen Hynek, questioned this conclusion. Hynek argued that the reported low-altitude manoeuvres, the proximity of the object to the witnesses and the consistency of the police officers' testimony were difficult to reconcile with the official explanation.

The case was later examined in greater detail by journalist John G. Fuller, whose 1966 book Incident at Exeter brought the event to international attention and remains one of the most comprehensive contemporary accounts of the investigation.

Historical Significance

The Exeter Incident is significant for several reasons. It involved:

  • Multiple independent witnesses.
  • Two trained police officers.
  • A prolonged observation rather than a brief sighting.
  • A formal Project Blue Book investigation.
  • Extensive national media coverage.

The incident also became one of the cases most frequently cited by critics of Project Blue Book, who argued that the official explanation did not adequately account for the available evidence.

Today, the Exeter Incident is widely regarded as one of the strongest multiple-witness police cases in the historical UAP record and continues to be referenced in discussions of official investigations during the 1960s.

Sources