UAPRADUAP Research and Disclosure
Member Area

Condon Report Published

Overview

The Condon Report, officially titled Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, was published in January 1969 following the completion of a two-year investigation conducted by the University of Colorado under contract with the United States Air Force. (Although the study concluded during 1968, the final report was published in January 1969. Many timelines therefore reference either 1968 or 1969.)

Led by physicist Dr. Edward U. Condon, the study represented the most comprehensive independent scientific review of UFO reports commissioned by the U.S. government during the twentieth century. Its findings would have a lasting influence on official U.S. policy and directly contributed to the closure of Project Blue Book later that year.

Background

The Colorado Study was commissioned in the aftermath of the 1966 Michigan UFO sightings and growing criticism of the Air Force's handling of unidentified aerial reports.

The study's objectives were to:

  • Review selected historical Project Blue Book cases.
  • Investigate new reports received during the study period.
  • Assess whether UFO research had scientific merit.
  • Advise the Air Force on whether further official investigation was warranted.

A multidisciplinary team of scientists, engineers, psychologists and other specialists examined dozens of cases using contemporary investigative methods.

Findings

The final report concluded that:

  • Most investigated cases could be explained by conventional causes.
  • No evidence demonstrated that UFOs represented advanced technology beyond contemporary scientific understanding.
  • No evidence indicated that UFOs posed a direct threat to national security.
  • Further extensive scientific investigation of UFOs was unlikely to produce significant advances in scientific knowledge.

One of the report's most frequently quoted conclusions stated:

"Further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby."

Although this became the report's defining conclusion, the document also acknowledged that some individual cases remained unexplained due to insufficient or inconclusive evidence.

Debate and Criticism

The Condon Report has remained one of the most debated documents in the history of UAP research.

Supporters viewed it as a thorough scientific assessment that found no compelling evidence to justify continued government-sponsored investigation.

Critics argued that several case studies within the report appeared more significant than the report's overall conclusions suggested. Some researchers also pointed to internal memoranda-including the so-called "Low Memorandum"-which they believed indicated that the study may have approached the subject with preconceived expectations.

Astronomer Dr. J. Allen Hynek, who had served as scientific consultant to Project Blue Book, later expressed reservations about aspects of the report, arguing that some unexplained cases deserved continued scientific attention.

Despite these criticisms, the report became the principal scientific reference used by the U.S. Air Force in evaluating the future of Project Blue Book.

Historical Significance

The publication of the Condon Report marked the end of the first major era of official U.S. scientific investigation into unidentified flying objects.

Its conclusions provided the basis for the Air Force's decision to terminate Project Blue Book in December 1969 and shaped government policy for decades. For many years afterwards, the report was widely cited as evidence that further official investigation of UFOs was unnecessary.

However, renewed military reporting and government interest beginning in the twenty-first century have led historians and policymakers to re-examine the report's conclusions within the broader context of modern UAP investigations.

Today, the Condon Report remains one of the most influential-and controversial-documents in the history of the subject.

Sources