UAPRADUAP Research and Disclosure
Member Area

New York Times Disclosure Story

Overview

On 16 December 2017, The New York Times published an investigative article titled "Glowing Auras and 'Black Money': The Pentagon's Mysterious U.F.O. Program." The report revealed, for the first time, the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) and disclosed that the U.S. Department of Defense had funded a programme to investigate unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).

Widely regarded as the beginning of the modern era of public UAP disclosure, the article fundamentally changed public and governmental discussion of the subject. It demonstrated that the U.S. military had continued to investigate unexplained aerial encounters decades after the closure of Project Blue Book and introduced authenticated U.S. Navy videos to a global audience.

The story prompted renewed media attention, congressional interest and a series of official government initiatives that continue today.

The Investigation

The article was written by journalists Helene Cooper, Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean, drawing on interviews with current and former government officials, military personnel and individuals associated with the programme.

The investigation reported that:

  • The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) had operated within the Department of Defense.
  • The programme had received approximately $22 million in congressional funding.
  • The funding had been supported primarily through the efforts of Senator Harry Reid, with support from Senators Daniel Inouye and Ted Stevens.
  • Former intelligence officer Luis Elizondo had played a leading role in the programme before leaving the Department of Defense in 2017.

The article also highlighted the military's continued interest in unexplained aerial encounters involving Navy aviators.

Release of Navy Videos

Alongside the investigation, three U.S. Navy infrared videos received widespread public attention:

  • FLIR1 ("Tic Tac")
  • GIMBAL
  • GOFAST

The videos depicted unidentified objects recorded by the targeting systems of F/A-18 Super Hornet aircraft during separate military operations.

Although copies of the videos had previously circulated in limited form, the New York Times investigation brought them into mainstream public awareness.

In 2020, the Department of Defense officially confirmed that the videos were authentic recordings made by U.S. Navy personnel and formally released them to the public.

Public and Government Response

The publication generated significant international media coverage and marked a turning point in how UAPs were discussed.

In the years that followed:

  • The U.S. Navy introduced updated UAP reporting procedures.
  • Congress requested additional classified and public briefings.
  • The UAP Task Force (UAPTF) was established.
  • The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) began publishing annual UAP assessments.
  • The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) was later created to coordinate investigations across the Department of Defense.

The article also encouraged greater participation by military personnel willing to discuss previous encounters publicly.

Historical Significance

The New York Times investigation is widely regarded as the single most influential media publication in the modern history of UAPs.

Its significance lies in several key developments:

  • Public disclosure of an official Pentagon UAP programme.
  • Introduction of authenticated military sensor footage to a global audience.
  • Renewed congressional oversight of UAP investigations.
  • Increased transparency from the Department of Defense.
  • A shift in public discussion from speculation toward national security and aviation safety.

Unlike many earlier reports, the article relied on official sources, former government officials and documented military programmes rather than isolated eyewitness testimony.

Its publication marked the beginning of an ongoing period of government engagement with UAP issues that continues through congressional hearings, intelligence assessments and dedicated investigative offices.

Sources