UAP গবেষণা প্রোফাইল
Omer Eldadi
Team-cognition এবং uncertainty-reasoning psychologist
- পদবিTeam-cognition এবং uncertainty-reasoning psychologist
সংক্ষিপ্ত পরিচিতি
Omer Eldadi একজন psychologist যাঁর research team cognition, communication, decision-making under pressure এবং expert-group performance নিয়ে। Reichman University থেকে PhD এবং 2026 Fulbright Postdoctoral Fellowship নিয়ে Abraham Loeb-এর সঙ্গে Harvard Center for Astrophysics-এ কাজ করছেন। Fulbright project anomalous scientific phenomena-তে social/performance psychology apply করে—scientific teams uncertainty-র মধ্যে কীভাবে reason/communicate করে এবং paradigm-challenging evidence-এ communities কীভাবে respond করে। [S1]
Eldadi UAP Science Advisory Council-এর founding member; public roles data management, AI এবং human/social psychology। [S1][S2][S3]
UAPRAD-এর জন্য strongest relevance extraordinary phenomenon proof নয়; incomplete/contested evidence নিয়ে group reasoning-এর quality।
Team cognition research
Pre-UAP publications sport/performance/social psychology-তে। [S1][S4]
2025 review team cognition—shared knowledge, coordination, communication under pressure—analyse করে। [S4]
Another 2025 study expert/nonexpert esports teams-এর verbal communication ও coordinated effort examine করে। [S5]
Scientific/intelligence teams poor information sharing, authority deference, fragmented expertise, premature consensus, confirmation bias এবং overload-এর কারণে fail করতে পারে।
Fulbright project
Harvard project scientific anomalies নিয়ে team reasoning, communication, uncertainty এবং possible paradigm resistance study করে। [S1]
Opportunity: acceptance/rejection-এর social bias empirically study করা।
Risk: every criticism-কে paradigm resistance ধরে নেওয়া।
Bias দুই direction-এ measure করতে হবে।
IOSS / Loeb Scale
Eldadi, Tenenbaum এবং Loeb 2025-এ Interstellar Object Significance Scale publish করেন। [S6]
0–10 scale natural/expected থেকে artificial-origin evidence levels পর্যন্ত classification দেয়।
UAP relevance methodological: anomaly strength explicit করা।
কিন্তু numerical scale false precision দিতে পারে। Score evidence organize করে, replace নয়।
Technosignatures ও stigma
2026 policy preprint Closing the Technosignature Gap research funding এবং "giggle factor" discuss করে। [S7]
Stigma funding/participation affect করে; hypothesis true হওয়ার evidence নয়।
UAPSAC
Fulbright Eldadi-কে founding member বলে; public roles data management, AI, psychology। [S1][S2][S3]
Data systems interpret themselves না; shared classifications, uncertainty communication এবং disagreement protocols দরকার।
তবে demonstrated publication record psychology-তে strongest, computer science-এ নয়।
Richard Cloete-এর মতো primary ML engineer বলা উচিত নয় unless future technical work supports।
Disclosure preparedness
Eldadi Disclosure Foundation-এর 2026 psychological impact report-এর coauthor। [S8]
Report universal mass panic reject করে এবং heterogeneous response propose করে।
No privileged classified info এবং hypothetical strongest scenarios explicitly acknowledge করে।
NHI evidence নয়; contingency planning।
Scientific disagreement psychology
Key question: anomaly resistance healthy skepticism নাকি sociological inertia?
History-তে anomalies discoveries হয়েছে, আবার অনেক anomaly better measurement/calibration-এ disappear করেছে।
Serious research evidence quality, prior models, competing hypotheses, willingness to update, incentives compare করবে।
প্রমাণের বিশ্লেষণ
Mainstream expertise group cognition/communication-এ strong।
IOSS formal anomaly classification work দেখায়।
Disclosure work societal psychology address করে।
UAPSAC-specific outputs এখনও emerging।
যা প্রতিষ্ঠিত
- Reichman psychology PhD। [S1]
- Peer-reviewed team cognition/communication work। [S4][S5]
অনুপস্থিত বা অপ্রাপ্য প্রমাণ
Future Fulbright/UAPSAC methods দরকার: uncertainty communication, dissent, groupthink, confidence updates, data-category standardisation।
সামগ্রিক মূল্যায়ন
Omer Eldadi strong addition কারণ better sensors থাকলেও group reasoning poor হলে conclusion poor হতে পারে।
Team-cognition expertise human cognition-কে UAP methodology-এর explicit অংশ করে।
IOSS anomaly levels formalise করতে পারে, কিন্তু evidence-এর subordinate থাকতে হবে।
উৎস
[S1] Fulbright Israel — Omer Eldadi. https://www.fulbright.org.il/node/4837 [S2] Disclosure Foundation — UAPSAC. https://disclosure.org/news/uap-science-advisory-council [S3] DefenseScoop. https://defensescoop.com/2026/06/17/new-science-advisory-council-forms-to-help-us-government-resolve-the-uap-mystery/ [S4] Team cognition. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40582387/ [S5] Esports communication. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40882969/ [S6] IOSS. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-astrobiology/article/interstellar-object-significance-scale-loeb-scale-astronomical-classification-of-interstellar-objects/33F927C9600721DF14D1AA8525D7EDC0 [S7] Closing the Technosignature Gap. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6444296 [S8] Disclosure Foundation — Psychological Impact. https://disclosure.org/research/psychological-impact-of-uap-nhi-disclosure